TL;DR
Aggregating predictions from 15 large language models (LLMs) on binary questions demonstrated that learned aggregation methods significantly outperformed individual models. This suggests that LLM crowds can exhibit wisdom-of-crowds effects, but contamination in training data must be addressed for accurate assessments.
✦ Why It Matters
Ensure your model evaluations are free from training data contamination to achieve accurate performance assessments.
Key Takeaways
How It Works
The study employed learned aggregation techniques, specifically multilayer perceptrons and logistic regression, to combine outputs from multiple LLMs. These methods effectively learned to weigh the predictions based on model diversity, leading to superior performance compared to individual models.
⚠ The Catch
Training cutoff contamination was a significant confound, affecting the perceived accuracy of models and leading to misleading conclusions about their capabilities.
Related