We’re launching Lyria 3.5 in Google Flow Music, with advances across musicality, lyrics, vocals, and creative control
deepmind.google·6d ago
AI Engineering
Hacker News·25d ago·5 min read
Don't discontinue Gemini 2.5 Flash
TL;DR
Users are urging the continuation of Gemini 2.5 Flash due to its superior performance in specific workflows. Despite attempts to adapt to Gemini 3 Flash, benchmarks indicate it falls short in latency and overall effectiveness.
✦ Why It Matters
Evaluate your current model usage and consider advocating for the retention of effective tools like Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Key Takeaways
- Conduct internal benchmarks to assess model performance.
- Explore prompting techniques to optimize newer models.
- Document specific use cases that rely on 2.5 Flash.
- Engage with the Gemini team to express the need for 2.5 Flash.
Full Summary
Gemini 2.5 Flash has been a critical tool for users relying on its performance for specific workflows. Internal benchmarks reveal that Gemini 3 Flash does not match the latency and performance of 2.5 Flash, even after adjusting prompting techniques according to new guidelines.
Users have reported issues with thought leakage in the newer model, further highlighting its inadequacies. The closest alternative, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, also fails to meet the performance standards set by 2.5 Flash.
As a result, many users are concerned about the potential discontinuation of 2.5 Flash, which has proven to be the best model for a variety of tasks. This situation underscores the importance of maintaining access to effective tools that meet user needs.