Announcing MCP Toolbox Java SDK v1.0: Agentic data access for the enterprise
cloud.google.com·6d ago
Cloud & Infrastructure
The New Stack·4d ago·5 min read
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs. Opus 5.5: 42% cheaper and perfect on every run
TL;DR
Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5.5 outperforms Opus 5.5 in accuracy and cost-effectiveness, achieving 42% lower overall costs while maintaining perfect output in tests.
✦ Why It Matters
Consider using Sonnet 5.5 for coding tasks to reduce costs and improve accuracy.
Key Takeaways
- Use Sonnet 5.5 for hard-coding tasks to save costs.
- Opus 5.5 is better for agentic tasks due to speed.
- Monitor token usage to manage costs effectively.
- Test models with high output limits for optimal performance.
Full Summary
Claude Sonnet 5.5 was launched shortly after Opus 5.5, boasting a score of 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 compared to Opus's 66.4%. Sonnet 5.5 is priced at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, significantly cheaper than Opus's $4 and $20.
Testing involved three tasks: bug fixing, writing a dependency resolver, and addressing concurrency issues. Sonnet 5.5 achieved perfect results in all tests, costing $12.69 for 15 runs, while Opus 5.5 cost $22.07.
Although Sonnet 5.5 often required more tokens, it still proved to be 36% cheaper overall. The findings suggest that Sonnet 5.5 is ideal for hard-coding tasks, while Opus 5.5 remains preferable for agentic tasks due to its speed.