EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
deepmind.google·6d ago
AI Engineering
Hacker News·Aug 21·5 min read
Grand jury declines to indict Ohio man charged with destroying Flock camera
TL;DR
A grand jury in Ohio has decided not to indict Cody Morelock, who was accused of vandalizing a Flock automatic license plate reader camera. The police estimated the damage at over $1,000.
✦ Why It Matters
Consider the legal ramifications of interacting with surveillance technology in your area.
Key Takeaways
- Stay informed about local surveillance technology initiatives.
- Engage in community discussions about privacy rights.
- Support legislation that regulates police use of surveillance data.
- Monitor social media for organized events against surveillance.
Full Summary
Cody Morelock was accused of felony vandalism for dismantling a Flock camera in Union Township, Ohio, with police estimating damages over $1,000. Surveillance footage and credit card information led to his identification.
However, a Clermont County grand jury chose not to indict him, resulting in the dismissal of charges. This case is part of a broader backlash against Flock's license plate reader technology, which records vehicle data for police use.
Reports indicate a surge in vandalism against Flock cameras nationwide, with social media campaigns encouraging similar actions. Concerns have also arisen regarding police misuse of the technology, prompting Flock to propose new safeguards, though critics argue these measures are insufficient.