EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
deepmind.google·6d ago
AI Engineering
Hacker News·Jul 30·5 min read
I flagged two research papers for fake authors and both were accepted as orals
TL;DR
Two research papers with fake authorship were flagged but still accepted for oral presentations at a conference, raising concerns about peer review integrity.
✦ Why It Matters
Review your submission processes to ensure author verification is robust and reliable.
Key Takeaways
- Thoroughly check all citations for accuracy before submission.
- Be aware of the potential for AI-generated content in your work.
- Engage deeply with your research to avoid common pitfalls.
- Consider using tools to audit your bibliography for errors.
Full Summary
During a summer review of 22 submissions across various conferences, 68% were found to have fabricated citations, author lists, or were generated by large language models (LLMs). This phenomenon, referred to as being in the 'slop trenches,' indicates a growing problem in academic publishing where AI-generated content is not adequately filtered out during peer review.
An analysis showed that a staggering number of papers, including tens of thousands, likely contain invalid AI-generated references. Reviews are failing to catch these issues, with a significant percentage of hallucinated citations remaining even after expert review.
The authors express frustration over the time wasted on submissions that lack proper citations, emphasizing the need for authors to engage deeply with their work. The findings suggest a systemic issue in the peer review process that could undermine the credibility of scientific literature.