EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
deepmind.google·6d ago
AI Engineering
Lobsters·Aug 21·5 min read
War is not god, neither is AI
TL;DR
The author critiques the notion that war is an eternal force, as suggested in the novel Blood Meridian, arguing against this fundamental premise. This reflection raises questions about the nature of conflict and its implications for understanding AI's role in society.
✦ Why It Matters
Reflect on how your views on conflict and technology shape your work in AI development today.
Key Takeaways
- Question the foundational motivations behind AI development in your projects.
- Recognize the parallels between war and the institutionalization of AI.
- Consider the implications of treating AI as an independent entity.
- Assess the risks of institutional power plays in AI advancements.
Full Summary
Blood Meridian posits that war is an eternal entity, but the author challenges this notion by suggesting that war is a manifestation of life constrained by finite resources. As life competes for these resources, conflict arises, leading to what we label as war.
This conflict has been institutionalized, creating a self-sustaining cycle where war exists for its own sake. The author draws parallels to artificial intelligence, arguing that intelligence itself is not an independent entity but a reflection of life navigating scarcity.
Current AI models, particularly large language models (LLMs), are trained on the remnants of human intelligence, leading to a potential 'LARPing' of intelligence. The implications of this perspective raise concerns about the motivations behind AI development and the risks associated with institutional power plays.