EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
deepmind.google·6d ago
AI Engineering
Lobsters·27d ago·5 min read
Push-based vs Pull-based Customization
TL;DR
A new approach to C++26 aims to replicate Rust's attribute functionality through a partial specialization of formatter, but it faces challenges in implementation.
✦ Why It Matters
Consider experimenting with partial specialization in your C++ projects to enhance customization.
Key Takeaways
- Explore partial specialization for better attribute handling in C++.
- Understand the differences between push-based and pull-based customization.
- Experiment with template specialization to improve code behavior.
- Reflect on the limitations of current C++ attribute implementations.
Full Summary
The post discusses efforts to align C++26 with Rust's attribute system, specifically focusing on how to create a partial specialization of the formatter. This specialization is intended to 'pull' annotations and process data members effectively.
However, the implementation does not fully achieve the desired behavior, revealing limitations in the approach. The author reflects on the differences between push-based and pull-based customization methods, emphasizing the complexities involved in adapting C++ to match Rust's capabilities.
The exploration highlights the nuances of type handling and the intricacies of template specialization in C++. Ultimately, while the goal is ambitious, the results indicate that further refinement is necessary to bridge the gap between the two languages.