EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
deepmind.google·6d ago
AI Engineering
Lobsters·Aug 31·5 min read
I attended a conference recently and AI use by academics was absurd
TL;DR
At a recent conference, the majority of attendees were disengaged, with only a small fraction actively listening. Notably, most panelists relied on AI tools to generate questions and responses during the Q&A session, highlighting a concerning trend in academic engagement.
✦ Why It Matters
Consider limiting AI use in discussions to foster genuine engagement and critical thinking.
Key Takeaways
- Encourage active listening during presentations.
- Limit AI use in academic discussions.
- Promote genuine dialogue among participants.
- Reflect on the impact of technology on engagement.
Full Summary
During a recent conference, it was observed that less than 10% of attendees were actively engaged in the talks, with many distracted by their devices. This lack of attention was particularly evident during the Q&A session, where most panelists, except for one, utilized AI tools to record questions and formulate responses.
This reliance on AI for real-time interaction raises questions about the authenticity of academic discourse and the depth of understanding among participants. The use of AI in this context suggests a shift towards convenience over genuine engagement, potentially undermining the value of in-person discussions.
The experience was disheartening for those who value meaningful dialogue and critical thinking in academic settings.